When it comes to the overreaching of government, there are usually two paternal personifications: Big Brother and the Nanny State.
Both are invasive in their own right and typically used in tyranical tandem to undermine the liberty this nation professes to harbor.
The Nanny State monicker is applied to governmental regulations and laws which are supposed to be in the best interest of the populous but often eliminate freedom of choice. These hinderances are usually lobbied for by groups of people who think that they are protecting others who can’t make the decisions for themselves.
Big Brother generally refers to the surveillance and control of the people by the government, deriving its name from George Orwell’s 1984.
Headlines across the country have been rife with recent examples of big government, on local and national levels.
Earlier this month, San Francisco banned Happy Meals. In an effort to combat childhood obesity, the city–at the behest of Nanny State nimrods–enacted an ordiance that prohibits “restaurants from offering a free toy with meals that contain more than set levels of calories, sugar and fat,” according to the LA Times. The ruling also requires restaurants “to provide fruits and vegetables with all meals for children that come with toys.”
Continue reading